Iâve lost all respect for Jake Tapper, and for the media ecosystem he thrives in. This cursed blog post is the first reason why.
Computer: enhance that blogâs title and author. Mostly so I donât have to see that warped baffling thumbnail art anymore.
When Jake Tapper wrote that, he was a 33-year-old adult whoâd worked full-time in media for half a decade. In 2003, he was five years into a full-time job at Salon dot com. He also thought what you see above is both funny and important. It had to be both, to be posted on Salon dot com. I donât know if you remember media in 2003, but Salon dot com was Serious Internet Journalism. Salon was more of a âSĂĄh-lĂłnâ, in that French-y pronunciation. Admittedly Salon was also edgy, in the sense that it was less edgy than Vice dot com, because none of Salonâs writers had the physical courage to take drugs or try skateboarding. This made Salon a hybrid of boring and snarky (âborkyâ?). That borky respectability made Salon a sterling credit on an Important Personâs resume. Less than half a year after this racist blog post wasted our national pixels, Jake Tapper promoted himself to a better job at ABC News.
What did Jake Tapper do in the run-up to getting ABCâs money, getting CNNâs money, and getting his hair to turn that brushed silver color your mom trusts? Jake Tapper blogged the most cursed journalism-adjacent blog Iâve ever read. He begins by noticing two things. Two things which â get this â have one parallel?
You know a blog is about to nail its comparison when it cites two entire paragraphs of background information. Here comes the sweatiest âwhat if X was Yâ ever fudged!
Also, this parallel is not a parallel. Itâs a borderline perpendicular. Here is Jake Tapperâs premise: âtwo hip-hop magazines competing for money = two news publications disagreeing about the rationale for war.â False! Wrong! Nope! Trying to sell more copies of a music magazine is different from questioning Colin Powellâs propwork.
Jake Tapperâs premise becomes even more hideous when you realize he feels this âparallelâ is funny. So funny, it deserves more attention than the choice to invade Iraq several weeks later. Maybe a column thinking that choice through would be more valuable. Especially because illuminating that decision was Jake Tapperâs job. Instead, [OMINOUS KEYBOARD SOUNDS]:
âDizaamâ is right. At least, I think itâs right? âDizaamâ is probably a Black version of âdamnâ, in Jake Tapperâs comedy version of Black. Weâll be forced to hazard these kinds of guesses the whole rest of the blog. I donât speak either of the two languages this blog is written in. Those two languages are âfraudulent AAVEâ and âa chummy Ivy League rolodex of everybody in the nice offices in mainstream media.â This blog is impenetrable if youâre not inside Jake Tapperâs skull.
Every ânameâ in this blog sent me on a fetch quest. Those red names are hyperlinks. The hyperlinks are designed to help you understand Jakeâs jokes, because no element of his writing does that. I assume the links worked in 2003. Today those first two links lead to a 404 page (understandable) and the URL âfoxnews.comâ. Thanks for the clarifying tip of âFox News existsâ, mister scoopster journalist Jake Tapper. Due to these dead and useless links, I had to surf the rest of the World Wide Web for my own answers. I googled âThe New Republic Orrâ, to try to identify âSnoop-Kittyâ. The top results are Christopher Orr and Ben Orr. God dammit, Jake.
Also no matter which guy you mean, âLudachristopherâ and âThe Notorious B.E.N.â are both right there. Iâm decades further from Luda and Biggieâs peaks than you were when you wrote this. Be clear or funny or clever or tolerable, Iâm begging you. Dealerâs choice. Speaking of dealerâs choice, âSnorr-Doggâ is also a little bit more workable than âSnoop-Kittyâ. God dammit, Jake. Letâs move on. Moving on to a warning for you, My Dear Hotdogger: this blog is short and Iâm going to show you every line.
This next characterâs hyperlink is another 404 page. I found his name by googling âthe new republic literary editor 2003â. According to one of the first results â a magazine unironically named Highbrow Magazine â Jake Tapperâs âL.W. Cool-Lâ is Leon Wieseltier. An elderly magazine editor who mastered the art of typing âthis novel is good/bad/meh.â That means Jake Tapper shoehorned an elderly book critic into his hip-hop pastiche of Iraq War jingoism. Jake probably did this because everybody who knows about media insider crud knows about Leon Wieseltier. You canât just mention The New Republic without mentioning Leon Wieseltier! That elderly book critic is an icon! An icon who harassed and assaulted female colleagues throughout the 2000s! Oh no! Apparently that was well-known to media insiders! Oh no! I wish one of the few people with media insider knowledge wouldâve spoken up about it. Why didnât Jake Tapper speak up about it? Maybe he was too busy coining Rap Nicknames.
Jake Tapper is already out of âjokes.â He re-used âbee-hatchâ within two sentences of getting nothing out of it the first time.
âPurple Rainesâ is New York Times executive editor Howell Raines. âPurple Rainâ is a seminal album by the musician Prince. I admit Prince rapped a little. This still feels like Jake Tapper thinks every Black person raps and also knows each other. Please reference an actual rapper, Jake Tapper. You had ten entire years to think of “Howell Insane-In-The-BâRaines”. Tragically, âPurple Rainesâ is the strongest nickname in this section. âCollinsioâ is Gail Collins. âGerald Boyeeeeeedâ is the real name Gerald Boyd plus one non-idea. Hey Hotdoggers: did you know Raines and Boyd resigned shortly after Jake Tapper wrote this? Because they both failed to notice their star reporter was printing fraud? Somehow Jake Tapper wrote a media insider comedy skit about media insider horsehockey, without noticing the media insider scoop of the decade. Wow. Another anti-scoop for Jake. Jake couldnât investigate a fart if his own ass published it.
I need you to know âMarty âMasterâ P.â is referencing the publisher of The New Republicâs publisher. That guy was also a Harvard professor. He could not secure a promotion at Harvard because when Harvard tried to promote him students organized protests against his personal racism. In 1994, he publicly claimed most Black people have âcultural deficiencies.â I wonder why black culture expert Jake Tapper failed to focus his satire on an interesting claim like that. Itâs an unusual belief. Right? Itâs an unusual belief, right, Jake?? Unless âcultural deficienciesâ did not strike Jake Tapper as an unusual belief????
The Onion created Herbert Kornfeld six years before Jake Tapper blogged this.
Iâm pretty sure that hyperlinked name is a joke about the eugenicist Andrew Sullivan. Mr. Sullivan was prominently nicknamed âSullyâ. Jake Tapper wrote this blog a few months after 8 Mile made a quarter billion dollars at the box office. I bring that up because, Jake: Jake. Jake! âSlim Sullyâ, Jake. âSlim Sullyâ! Are you so ferociously racist you forgot anyone white has ever rapped? Also, whole separate problem, we can punch up Jakeâs idea (and correctly spell Jakeâs idea) to get âBone Thugs-N-Harmo-Sullyâ. Or just âBone Thugs-N-Sullivanâ. Spell it correctly, Jake. Youâd think a professional journalist would have heard of (precursor to) Googling something. Ask frigginâ Jeeves, Jake. Youâll hit it off with Jeeves right away, Jake, because heâs as âuncomfortable around minoritiesâ-coded as you are.
Iâm more confused about the âNorthwest/West Sideâ reference. My guess is that itâs a joke about The New York Times and The New Republic having offices in two adjacent portions of Washington D.C.. I hope Iâm not right. If Iâm right, Jake Tapper wrote a joke about the facilities of two media publications, in his column for a third media publication, in a way thatâs only legible to people who work for media publications. Itâs a Beltway Bullshit ouroboros. Itâs turd-les all the way down.
I think âwolfsmanâ is supposed to be a lowercase Internet username. The hyperlink goes to a dead page at CNN Money. So let me get this straight: Jakeâs joke is that fictional Wolf Blitzer is leaving an Internet comment on an in-person conversation. Setting that logical collapse aside: the in-person conversation is between New Republic Magazine staff members, who are also in a gang war, because there were two competing hip-hop magazines during the run-up to invading Iraq, and I guess because Tupac and Biggie got murdered in 1996 and 1997. âWord.â Nothing timelier in 2003 than the 1995 Source Awards. Timeline-wise, Jake Tapperâs comedy reference is like if you made a new âcovfefeâ joke in the winter of 2023. God dammit, Jake.
Speaking of âgod dammit Jakeâ: god damn YOU, Jake Tapper. I tried to circle back to find something redeeming about you. I figured I had an uplifting last beat here. I could present this blog as evidence that any great person has a minorly scumbaggy past. I wanted to end on a sincere version of that comedy sketch where Tim Robinson douses steaks.
Folks: I cannot say that about Jake Tapper. After blogging this, he did nothing of worth in the ensuing 22 years. Just ask his agent! Jake Tapperâs bio on his webpage for paying him exorbitant speaking fees says his key accomplishments are 1) winning awards 2) being on a screen while democracy ends 3) maintaining a pleasant vanilla.
Has Jake Tapper improved society? Has Jake Tapper made anything better? Or has he earned seven figures a year â and gobbled up oxygen that could sustain real novelists â by hogging one of the only chairs in America where somebody could speak truth to power? Donât get me wrong: Jake Tapper investigated and helped overturn one wrongful conviction. However, he did that because his dad asked him to. His dad is a physician with a personal stake in that case I linked. Also, Jakeâs dad went to college at Dartmouth. Itâs probably totally a wacky random coincidence that Jake got into Dartmouth too. What an epic tale. No story thrills me more than Jake Tapperâs rise from Ivy League legacy admission to Ivy League honorary degree. Jake tapperâs two Dartmouth gowns bookend a professional journey with impressive middle steps like âracist bloggerâ and âpaid spokesman for Hooters.â
If you thought Hooters spokesmanship was something I made up, you will be even more suspicious of my next screenshot.
God dammit what the hell how is that real I ask you. At the beginning of his post-Hooters stumble into media, Jake Tapper wrote for the Washington City Paper. He got famous, and got his Salon job, by writing a viral article. The viral article recounts the random-yet-insider luck that led Jake Tapper into a few dates with pre-scandal Monica Lewinsky.
Is the piece good? No. Is the piece shameful? Jake does not think so. However, yes it is. For one thing, it performs a pit stop to call Monica Lewinsky fat, in the form of genteel Yiddish ogling.
The Washington City paper even made âwackyâ tabloid art for Jakeâs piece. The premise of the joke art is that Jakeâs piece is hilariously different from tabloid media. Iâve read that piece. The reason the piece is different from tabloid media is no reasons. Jake Tapper is confident heâs superior to the people who write for tabloids, because he is superior to everybody.
So we still have a joyful ending to this story, my Dear Hotdoggers. And not just because The Onion brought back Jean Teasdale the other day. We live with busted institutions we cannot trust. We know this. We wish they were better. And we can also wish for ourselves to gain clarity about that situation. Jake Tapperâs racist blogging freed me to do that. I donât want to throw away any institution doing legitimate good. âBurn it all downâ is lazy. But I take comfort in knowing which few institutions donât deserve my eyeballs. Iâm excited to stuff our heroes into a trash can after confirming they belong there. The truth is, CNNâs backup version of Anderson Cooper is a bum. Iâm over him. You can be too. As the brilliant journalist and comedy writer Jake Tapper might put it, weâre no longer dizaamed to show him respizzle.
This article was brought to you by our fine sponsor and Hot Dog Supreme: CommonCentz, whoâs never been dizaamed by Tapperâs respizzle.
6 replies on “Learning Day: Jake Tapperđ”
Good god. It’s like that Dogs from the Hood book all over again
As the last third of this article can attest, there are many things to discuss about Jake Tapper, and I spent two whole peaceful seconds wondering which would be today’s focus before I realized, with mounting horror, “oh, God, it’s the rap-beef article”.
Wow, I had no idea Jake Tapper wrote something like this. This is a really well researched article. I feel like more people need to know about this.
One of the things people who want to seem smart always say when they criticize the political press is that it’s all about ratings and clicks. Jake Tapper is living proof of how dumb that idea is.
While he’s been at the top of the food chain at CNN, their ratings and audience numbers have gone down the drain. Likewise for stiffs like Wolf Blitzer, who has been around at CNN for 32 years. Walter Cronkite didn’t even make 19 years at CBS!
While Wolf Blitzer has been at CNN, their advertisers have gone from Cadillac and Microsoft to today’s bottom of the barrel crowd of elderly medalert companies and zinc supplement sellers.
People like Tapper are the top reporters because the execs who run things are key members of what Schmidt rightfully calls “Beltway Bullshit ouroboros.” That’s it!
We got to this place because a succession of incompetent execs decided nothing was more important than shaking the quivering hands of Lyndsey Graham and James Carville. That’s it!
People who want to be seen as smart can’t believe network execs would do this. But you can’t look at the everlasting careers of Tapper Blitzer, Stephanopoulos and come up with any rational basis in profits, journalism, or anything else. It’s Beltway Bullshit ouroboros. That’s it!
Fun Fact: It’s not just an American thing! Basically all media and politics in the UK is controlled/owned/close to a handful of Oxford and Cambridge graduates who were prepped by old public (incredibly private, expensive, and exclusive) schools. Some of these people are wealthy landowners, some are literally nobility, some have just inherited a ridiculously important role, and some were just in the same drama club. Yes, even the ‘good ones’.
And some of them are the same ones as ours, and Australia’s.