Iām not proud of this, but I still have a hard time with sissyneck. I was originally really turned off by the stream of consciousness/misspelling and malapropisms, but later read a piece or two and got some guffaws. And then sissynard/Denneck made me laugh and broke my brainā1-900-hotdoggās hardest reads (one for density and obscure references, the other for density and idiosyncratic logic & spelling). I tried reading this one and was enjoying the content but getting a headache. I finally figured it out: I am extremely anal retentive about spelling – mostly my own, I try not to be obnoxious and long ago realized spelling and smarts had no good relationship. (Plenty of examples of having both, neither, or one without the other.) BUT that doesnāt stop my brain from basically starting to overheat from my internal spellchecker losing its shit as one of my brainās background processesāhence, sissyneck-influenced headache, there paragraphs in.
Iām not proud of this, but at least the puzzle is solved. THIS puzzle. Was all know that sissyneck poses and presents many puzzles what man may not ken. (Resisting the temptation of writing that last bit in poorly thought out imitation sissyneck prose.)
Thank you for joining me in this pointless self-examination.
āThere paragraphs inā – geez. Of course I end up doing that in my comment.
2 replies on “Learning Day: You Are All Sanpaku”
Iām not proud of this, but I still have a hard time with sissyneck. I was originally really turned off by the stream of consciousness/misspelling and malapropisms, but later read a piece or two and got some guffaws. And then sissynard/Denneck made me laugh and broke my brainā1-900-hotdoggās hardest reads (one for density and obscure references, the other for density and idiosyncratic logic & spelling). I tried reading this one and was enjoying the content but getting a headache. I finally figured it out: I am extremely anal retentive about spelling – mostly my own, I try not to be obnoxious and long ago realized spelling and smarts had no good relationship. (Plenty of examples of having both, neither, or one without the other.) BUT that doesnāt stop my brain from basically starting to overheat from my internal spellchecker losing its shit as one of my brainās background processesāhence, sissyneck-influenced headache, there paragraphs in.
Iām not proud of this, but at least the puzzle is solved. THIS puzzle. Was all know that sissyneck poses and presents many puzzles what man may not ken. (Resisting the temptation of writing that last bit in poorly thought out imitation sissyneck prose.)
Thank you for joining me in this pointless self-examination.
āThere paragraphs inā – geez. Of course I end up doing that in my comment.